please explain a KLX - i have WR & KDX
- Thread starter robjamell
- Start date
- Jan 8, 2000
- 3,331
- 1
As you know, the WR250 is a YZ250 with a wide ratio (hence the WR) transmission and heavier flywheel. The KDX is…well it’s like nothing else in the Kawasaki line up.
The KLX is a four-stroke woods bike. It came in two displacements, 250 and 300. They are very heavy bikes. Like any bike, they can be modified to perform much different from originally intended, but at the end of the day it is an “old school” four stroke.
If you’re into woods riding, and you can get one at a good price, by all means get it. They are nice, bulletproof machines. Just don’t start a thread “how is a KLX on the MX tracks”.
The KLX is a four-stroke woods bike. It came in two displacements, 250 and 300. They are very heavy bikes. Like any bike, they can be modified to perform much different from originally intended, but at the end of the day it is an “old school” four stroke.
If you’re into woods riding, and you can get one at a good price, by all means get it. They are nice, bulletproof machines. Just don’t start a thread “how is a KLX on the MX tracks”.
The above isn't totally true since they're not "very heavy bikes". Granted the KLX is heavy compared to a 2 stroke but not compared to the 4 stroke trail bikes it competes against (Honda XRs and Suzuki DRZs). It shares some parts with the KDX and in fact the best way to think of it is as a 4 stroke KDX. Just as the KDX wasn't designed to compete with CRs and YZs (that's what KXs are for), the KLX isn't designed to compete against YZFs and such (that's what the KXF is for).
I had one for a couple years and it's a good bike that can be successfully harescrambled. The 6 speed, USD forks, liquid cooling, and perimeter frame make it a better XR250 IMHO. However, the lack of e-start makes it less desirable ot me than a KTM RFS, WRF, or the new CRF250X.
I had one for a couple years and it's a good bike that can be successfully harescrambled. The 6 speed, USD forks, liquid cooling, and perimeter frame make it a better XR250 IMHO. However, the lack of e-start makes it less desirable ot me than a KTM RFS, WRF, or the new CRF250X.
KAWA200'sRule
Member
- Mar 15, 2004
- 213
- 0
It has no throttle response because of the streetbike carb
Ok, fair enough. There are a couple mods you have to do to make them work. First, uncork the airbox, just like a KDX, which is free. Next, buy the Stroker headpipe. The stock one was originally used on the KLX250 and when they opened it to 300 they never redid the pipe, so it's smaller than the port. Doh! Finally, spend $300 and put a pumper carb on it. Now you have a nice little thumper that is repsonsive and will rev to the rev limter, and is even a little easier to start.
The KTM 300exc is kind of like a better KDX or WR250. If you can have only one bike and need to do woods and maybe some MX, it's hard to go wrong with a 300exc. In fact, many have nicknamed it a "3 stroke", with Dirt Rider mag noting it's power is more 4 stroke-like than many of the modern 4 strokes.
Don't know too much about the '96 models, though. I do know the '99 was a great year (bike of the year that year) and that my next bike is a 2004 300exc. Try a search in the KTM/Euro forum to get some feedback and expected pricing. You can also check out ktmtalk.com and cycletrader.com.
Don't know too much about the '96 models, though. I do know the '99 was a great year (bike of the year that year) and that my next bike is a 2004 300exc. Try a search in the KTM/Euro forum to get some feedback and expected pricing. You can also check out ktmtalk.com and cycletrader.com.
