Ol'89r
LIFETIME SPONSOR
- Jan 27, 2000
- 6,958
- 45
I keep reading these threads about which bike sucks more. A two stroke or a four stroke. :whoa:
So, I have given this a lot of thought lately and this is what I came up with.
It takes the four stroke twice the amount of time to push, or suck, the same volume of air as a two stroke does in half the amount of time. If you compare a 250cc two stroke and a 250cc four stroke, it takes only one stroke to push, or suck, the same volume of air in the two stroke, whereas it takes two strokes in the thumper to push or suck the same amount of air.
So, if one figures this in a revolutions per minute time span, two strokes actually do suck more than four strokes. :p In fact, they suck twice as much. :yikes:
I hope this puts an end to this controversy. :laugh:
So, I have given this a lot of thought lately and this is what I came up with.
It takes the four stroke twice the amount of time to push, or suck, the same volume of air as a two stroke does in half the amount of time. If you compare a 250cc two stroke and a 250cc four stroke, it takes only one stroke to push, or suck, the same volume of air in the two stroke, whereas it takes two strokes in the thumper to push or suck the same amount of air.
So, if one figures this in a revolutions per minute time span, two strokes actually do suck more than four strokes. :p In fact, they suck twice as much. :yikes:
I hope this puts an end to this controversy. :laugh: