DEANSFASTWAY

LIFETIME SPONSOR
May 16, 2002
1,192
0
Thanks Jeremy for the list . I never saw a piston blowout but Ive replaced many bladders from seals leaking and rubbing the shock bodies , mostly Showas , mostly newer Showas , KX 65s too . Only time Ive ever seen something really go bad with a piston setup was with an ATV AXIS shock (quality stuff) Penske type , like an Ohlins . Whoever built the shock(brand new) must have overfilled it with oil and had the piston too deep in the reservoir body and when the Racer hit a G out hard the piston or Nitro pressure blew out the end cap and split and like flared out the rezzy body clip area . The kid DNFed at a National . I guess in that respect there must be more care taken to position the piston correctly but no big deal if youre competent . Shed : whats a through rod ? Am I missing something ? (besides some hair)? Let us know . Thanks DEAN
 

shed

Member
Dec 9, 2001
40
0
A through rod damper is one where the piston rod protrudes through the top of the damper body. The significance of this is that when the damper is compressed, the rod volume inside the body remains the same, so there is no net fluid displacement, no need for a gas spring, no fluid compression, and more consistent damping characteristics. If I find a good wesite with a picture, I'll post a link.
 

Jeff Howe

Member
Apr 19, 2000
456
1
For what it's worth, I would like to see all shocks using piston style reservoir's. They don't need to be as complicated as Ohlins or PDS and a schraeder valve is simple to deal with. My Penske shock is much easier to work with then the others and you don't have to worry about a blown bladder causing problems. Imagine something as simple as a blown shock bladder costing a top National rider a win (and maybe a championship) and it really doesn't make much sense. I would also think a piston style rezzy would be more efficient at convection. Seems to me that rubber bladder could hold heat inside the shock better, which we don't want. I love my Penske and it's a damn shame they quit making them for MX bikes.
 

DEANSFASTWAY

LIFETIME SPONSOR
May 16, 2002
1,192
0
See Jeff Emigat Southwick 94 or was it Dowd or Henry , cant remember but one of them rode the moto out on a bouncer. When the Yamahas just turned blue. it was hot out. I like schraeder valves too and I put them on KTMs quite a bit ,youve just got to make sure they clear the exhaustpipe.
 

velosapiens

Member
Mar 18, 2002
170
0
seems like bladder/friction and bladder/area are the same thing, but maybe you mean something besides the swept seal area which creates the friction.

i have an 02 with the piston (EE revalve) and an 04 with a bladder (PRS revalve, in lehi utah). the 04 dogs up the 02 and any other bike i have ever ridden. i have no idea how much of that is the bladder. danny morgan of prs feels the bladder helps small-bump compliance by just being easier to get it started moving. i believe this, but i know people have had excellent results with the piston as well.

bottom line for me, it seems that both can be made to work well.
 

husqy510

Member
Jul 16, 2004
1
0
bladders /piston

the only two things i see that support the bladder setup are 1)the actual friction of the piston aginst the resivior adds to heat ..probably not a lot ,but still some . 2) in a quick hit the hydralic presure could deform the o- ring enough to cause some additional stiction .
the drawback of the bladder is if you scew up bleeding the system and have air left in the system you will be stretching the bladder beyond its normal shape everytime the shock is fully extended .it will fail in short order
 

terry hay

Member
Nov 8, 2003
200
0
Husqy
That is simply logic gone wild. You are siting lack of competentcy in assembly as a reason to promote the piston. I would tend to promote the performance capability of the bladder when things are as they should be. Appr. 30% of our PDS customers have the bladder installed with a high proportion track testing straight after. Its not hard to guage the happier of the two. I don't have a lot of time for things that don't work. I have worked with Australia's top Enduro rider for several years now and he simply won't have a shock without one.
Terry
 

Jeremy Wilkey

Owner, MX-Tech
Jan 28, 2000
1,453
0
This is why I left internet forums for a while. Guys Its simple.. They don't work any differently. Your chasing a waste of time.. Friction is not an issue. Its real, its measurable.. But its not a factor due to its small effect.. The effect of improvements with the bladder come down to differences in build.. If you do them the same and right the shocks work the same, till the gas leaks out of the bladder which does happen BTW.

Want in on the secret? Bladders are used because they are cheaper, and some suspension tuners are to cheap as to not by the right tools to build the shock properly..


BR,
Jer
 

Jeremy Wilkey

Owner, MX-Tech
Jan 28, 2000
1,453
0
Rick#3,
I've read the same thing.. I can only pray to God its not 1.) a single piston! 2.) a Ohlins clone..

I used a single piston set up for a while.. What a waste!

Jer

I'm writing a article on needle stuff.. More soon!
 
Apr 26, 2000
133
0
Hi Jer,
Did you find out anymore information on this?

"Rick#3,
I've read the same thing.. I can only pray to God its not 1.) a single piston! 2.) a Ohlins clone.. "
 

Jeremy Wilkey

Owner, MX-Tech
Jan 28, 2000
1,453
0
The results are in..

I hope you guys enjoy this!
 

Attachments

  • Bladder Verses Piston Arguments in PDS Shock Absorbers.doc
    35 KB · Views: 606
Top Bottom