I assume this was directed at me so I will respond. In no way, shape, or form did I either say or imply that there should be no laws. I based my response on the contents of Glitch's posts and nothing more. He said that he gave his friend NO money for alcohol. I must presume his innocence because, after all, that is the whole basis of our judicial system.a454elk said:Assuming one would committ a crime because others had in the past isn't an issue. The laws are there for everyone, if you break them, you pay, if you don't you continue on in your life. So basically you're saying that there should be no laws or am I misunderstanding what you said.
I agree with this 100%. The biggest problem with the judicial system in this country is civil law. Our society is far to litigious, anyone will sue anyone for anything nowadays. Have you looked at all the warnings they have on common household items now? It seems there is no place for common sense anymore.a454elk said:Having laws don't point the finger or judge, it gives us guidelines to follow. Morons doing wrong is what makes laws in the first place. Falls back on the one guy that ruins it for the rest. Why do you think buying a house has so much dang paperwork. It's because some jackass looked for a loophole to get out of something or to sue. Stepping off the soapbox, thank you. :)