tim_from_az
Member
- Sep 18, 2003
- 48
- 0
Originally posted by canyncarvr
re: 'Eric states that he preffers to go this way and that you will not get the top end out of the 200 due to its' porting.
I believe the number is 220.
Yes. You'll have better luck making a 200 into a hard low-end pulling machine than making a 220 a top-end screamer. The cylinder between the two is considerably different, notwithstanding bore size. Meaning (if 'notwithstanding' isn't clear) there is more to cylinder differences than bore size.
Originally posted by canyncarvr
...re: 'you will not get the top end out of the 200...'
If that was '220' it would make sense. You're saying you will not get the top end out of a 200 that you will out of a 220?
Originally posted by tim_from_az
I'm looking for some advice and opinions of the KDX 200 and 220. I ride an XR400. Great bike I ride mostly tight and technical singletrack what's the bike difference in the 200 vs the 220?
Thanks in advance
You are right on the money!!!Originally posted by tim_from_az
Thanks fo the feedback so far. Let me clarify that I would most likely keep the motor stock. In that case it sounds like the 200 has more top end, while the 220 has more torque, right?
Originally posted by tim_from_az
I've got a buddy who's gonna loan me his 96 KDX 200 this weekend to ride. Are there any big differences between this model year and a new 03 or 04?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?