I'm shopping '01-'02 bikes (KTM 400 EXC or 300 EXC)and '03 bikes (Yamaha WR 250). There's an 01 400 EXC I like and a friend mentioned the one downside of a 3-4 year old rfs is the eventual cost of an engine rebuild, especially since I myself am a non-wrencher. But, dropping ~$3k on a bike, it'd be nice to have a bike that's not going to need anything significant, beyond maintenance, for a long time... I can patiently wait for the best low hours/good deal to come along :bang: or find one that has already been rebuilt.
And that's where my question lies. Should I be afraid of, or happy to find, a rebuilt engine? I was told by the bike's owner that to prepare it for re-sell, they rebuilt the motor, on top of the usual: new plastics, new chain and sprockets, and tires. After a rebuild of a rfs, assuming I maintain it as recommended, what should the re-build's shelf-life be?
I'm an Eastern rider ridnig only on weekends, half the time chasing my 5 year old and his XR 50.
Thanks.
And that's where my question lies. Should I be afraid of, or happy to find, a rebuilt engine? I was told by the bike's owner that to prepare it for re-sell, they rebuilt the motor, on top of the usual: new plastics, new chain and sprockets, and tires. After a rebuild of a rfs, assuming I maintain it as recommended, what should the re-build's shelf-life be?
I'm an Eastern rider ridnig only on weekends, half the time chasing my 5 year old and his XR 50.
Thanks.
Last edited: