Yet another Eco wacko poll

fremontguy

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Jul 1, 2000

580

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #1

Msnbc has done it again, there spin is G.W.Bush against the enviroment etc. Vote here.... http://www.msnbc.com/news/562006.asp#survey

 

Y

yzracer49

Member

Mar 19, 2000

118

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #2

Done,

but you got to wonder about those "loaded" questions.

------------------
A nudge is a good as a wink to a blind man.
Know what I mean eh?
nudge nudge wink wink..

 

J

Jeff Allen

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Sep 23, 1999

475

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #3

done

------------------
Jeff
99 RM 125 "Mr Scary"
72 TS 185 "Mr Ugly"

 

B

BRush

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Jun 5, 2000

1,100

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #4

We're getting hammered on this one.

--------
Do you support President Bush's 'practical' approach to enviornmental issues?

* 5529 responses

Yes
35%

No
63%

Can't decide
3%


------------------
96 KDX 200

 

O

OffRoadWarrior

Member

Mar 13, 2001

49

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #5

Still getting hammered but they only have 5548 votes! We can swing this one but everybody has to vote!

___________________________________________

How about we get dirt bikers registered as an endangered species, maybe then we can get our habitat protected!

 

RM_guy

Moderator

Damn Yankees

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Nov 21, 2000

7,045

208

North East USA

• Apr 27, 2001

• #6

Done. Still not good:(

Yes
35%

No
63%

Can't decide
3%

 

TwinSpar

AssClown WannaBe

N. Texas SP

Aug 18, 1999

6,889

118

• Apr 27, 2001

• #7

I'll vote with the four computers at my desk and hit with a few servers as time allows. Let's nail this one!

 

MikeT

~SPONSOR~

Jan 17, 2001

4,112

11

• Apr 27, 2001

• #8

I voted but WHERE is the Presidents "practical" approach?? I wrote a response to the editor on that one.... How biased can you get. The question has a sarcastic tone to it and there is no way to come to a logical conclusion and responsibly answer the question..

 

R

RoadRash

Member

Sep 13, 2000

76

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #9

Done
Results were the same as RM Guy. I do like the Letter to Editor Feature at the bottom. I will be using that one a lot!:D

 

C

CAL

Sponsoring Member

Jul 19, 2000

2,032

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #10

Still 35 to 63

 

M

Maru16

Member

Mar 29, 2001

267

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #11

voted
we need to get a lot of people to that site and have them vote.

 

bbbom

~SPONSOR~

Aug 13, 1999

2,094

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #12

Yes, we do!!!!

I posted the link on several other recreational boards I've found and emailed it to my ever growing list!

 

Farmer John

T.C.F.<br>(tire changin' fool)

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Mar 8, 2000

1,993

7

• Apr 27, 2001

• #13

done

 

scar tissue

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Dec 27, 2000

1,429

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #14

Oops I almost voted no. :rolleyes: I had to fiqure out what his practical approach is. Maybe when we post these surveys we should also suggest which way to vote. That might help us less informed people. :o

 

W

WideOpen

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Dec 21, 2000

333

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #15

done and done...man we are lossing bad

 

S

smb_racing

Master of None

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Jul 31, 2000

2,085

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #16

come on guys

Done,

Do you support President Bush's 'practical' approach to enviornmental issues?

* 5678 responses

Yes
36%
No
62%
Duh, what's this button do?
3%

 

R

Rogue

Member

Dec 25, 2000

99

0

• Apr 27, 2001

• #17

Done

 

S

Sawblade

Timmy Timmy Timmy!

Sep 24, 2000

1,491

0

• Apr 28, 2001

• #18

5735 responses

Yes
36%

No
62%

Can't decide
2%

 

Y

yo its matt!

Member

Aug 26, 2000

69

0

• Apr 28, 2001

• #19

EVER WONDER IF THEY REALLY COUNT OUR VOTES!:think
come on guys vote!

 

Ol'89r

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Jan 27, 2000

6,961

45

• Apr 28, 2001

• #20

Done. Still 36 to 62. Sent a little note to the Editor also.

 

S

starcove

Member

Apr 8, 2001

29

0

• Apr 29, 2001

• #21

Done:think

 

KWJams

~SPONSOR~

Sep 22, 2000

1,167

4

• Apr 29, 2001

• #22

This statement is accurate, back then there was some huge problems but we have made great progress:

State and local governments lacked the awareness, the resources and the know-how to launch the kind of effort required. Business lacked the incentives and sense of responsibility to change their ways on their own. Individual citizens were unaware of how profoundly their daily activities and choices affected the environment.

Click to expand...

The results of this poll is nothing more than a reflection of some folks dislike of President Bush, not of his record since he took office.

How professional can this poll be considered when MSNBC can not even spell "environmental"! :eek:





Do you support President Bush's 'practical' approach to enviornmental issues?

* 5800 responses

Yes
36%

No
61%

Can't decide
2%

 

W

woodsdude

Member

Mar 31, 2000

32

0

MA

• Apr 30, 2001

• #23

Done...we are still getting our butt kicked. Vote early and vote often....

 

V

VOR 492

Member

Feb 18, 2001

100

0

• Apr 30, 2001

• #24

Done