As an uniformed, unbiased, and unquailified observer. I question that Thump has offered up a challenge to Okie. Advertising that he has the ability to win this match-up. And has offered up the usual, humiliating, price for defeat. Seeing how that Thump has claimed a secured victory. If in fact Okie wins, this battle, What would be Thumps price to pay? Remember I have never met either gentleman, and am basing my interest, on this post. Do we have a handicap here, or some type of betting odds? Should Thump's price be proportional to his ability to win, IF by chance he should lose?
Also we have the problem, that if ONE has called out the OTHER, in a public forum, and the ONE has an inherent superiority. The OTHER has to accept the challenge even if defeat is eminent ( being publically called out ). Who decides the fate of Thump if he looses? Do you Thump offer up a price for defeat since you chose Okie's punishment? Or does OKIE decide?,,,
Now you must excuse me I have a fire to fight,,, Would you hand me that can that say's petrol on it!! :debil: