Which one is better .. everyone vote :)

Which is better?


  • Total voters
    456

D!rtbag

Member
Apr 30, 2007
60
0
My pick

I picked photo one because it makes me feel that the picture is more realistic because it makes me fell as if im actually there kneeling at the turn as the bike kicks that sweet "Chocolate cake" all over the place. Id say if u r looking for a general picture to show like on a wall or in general, go with the first one. If u r looking for something to focus on you and ur bike, go for the second one. I personally feel the first one has more "reality" in it, while the other one has more, "Expression" in it. :)
 

SC_Rider_427

Member
Feb 20, 2007
45
0
I voted the second one, but after going back, there is something i like better about the first, maybe just having the backround?
 

MotoX219

Member
May 30, 2007
2
0
I think the first one is cool! It shows the dirt more and that is sweet, o by the way nice bike!
 

werty1234

Member
Jun 24, 2007
3
0
the 2nd one is better cause you can see the rider in more detail. that pic is sick anyway you put though :cool:
 

peterttr230

Member
Mar 26, 2007
23
0
I think they both look sick nice shots. The best part is you are looking at the camera. Keep up the good work man!
 

bclark001

Member
Sep 12, 2007
230
0
I like the top one it gives you more to imagine w/ the berm in the picture. but it still keeps your focus on the rider. very nice pictures though keep it up
 

White_Wolf

Member
Oct 1, 2007
44
0
I like number two.

It shows alot more detail and it the dirtbike fills up most of the shoot. Shows how intense the dude is. I like how you can see the dirt slinging more clearly and the dirt looks better then the green landscape
 

Isobareng

Member
Oct 16, 2007
139
0
First one hands down
 

P0PWAR

Member
Oct 13, 2007
39
0
I like to see the first one because it shows more dirt, and gives me a better idea of what he's working with.
 

warrior91

Member
Jan 31, 2008
26
0
Personally the background in #1 gives depth to the picture. Focus on rider good with beautiful background that does not overpower frame.
 

BigRedAF

Member
Jan 9, 2005
739
0
Nice dirt!

Looks like the stuff in Burleson, TX. The dirt in AZ sucks! I remember tires lasting forever in Texas, out here they die in one weekend.

It would be nice if the guy with the camera would have taken the shot 1/2 second later and captured some roost.
 

wake_rider

Member
Feb 21, 2007
481
2
I like the first better because your use of negative space. You get more of what is going on and less of just a rider on a bike
 

carter76112

Member
Aug 7, 2008
10
0
number 1

I prefer the first one, it gives a better sense of motion, draws the eye to all aspects of the frame ... the soil flying away from the rear wheel, the leg thrusting forward, the lopsided grin on the helmet :-) Great pic!
 

zachattack1

Member
Nov 10, 2008
7
0
Both! The first one is good for maybe just a nice picture. The second one is better for a poster.
 

ToddHawaii

Member
Apr 3, 2000
117
0
I think the first is a better picture - I've been a professional photographer for 12 years....the first is balanced, and your eyes are drawn to the center. The second is off-balance, and unlike most fun action shots that look great up close, this one doesn't work. Now...if you had cropped it even closer, and cut off some of the bike/helmet......then it would work :cool:
 

Porkchop

~SPONSOR~
Apr 27, 2001
341
0
Reply to awesome photo work

I like the first, how ever they're both excellent. The only thing that I would be bold enough to suggest is a huge mountain range in the background with 3000 wildly enthusiastic fans cheering the rider on. :yeehaw: Best Regards, Porkchop...
 

indypup

Member
Nov 18, 2012
3
0
biglou said:
It's a tossup for me. I tend to favor landscape over portrait, generally speaking. I could see this one cropped tight on the bars/helmet/eyes area, also.

+1
landscape over portrait
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…