Yellow vs Orange

Joined
Nov 27, 2000
Messages
13
Likes
0
#1
Hi everybody,

I currently got a DRZ400 but a couple of days ago I got
orange on my mind. A KTM400 EXC or maybe a 520 I
have been thinking.

If anyone got some experience from both a DRZ and a EXC
I'd really appreciate some comments on the differences.

thanks,
Nicklas
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2001
Messages
126
Likes
0
#2
I am wanting a 520exc in a bad way after sitting on one in the dealers showroom yesterday. I currently ride a KLX300 but the 520 will be my next bike when I can afford it. It was the perfect hight for me (5'-8" with toes touching when sitting on it) I was considering the 400 but for a few hundred more and about the same weight I want the 520. I have not seen a DRZ but can't imagine it can compare to the 520 since both have the button and the KTM is lighter...and just looks better too :)
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2001
Messages
22
Likes
0
#3
I wanted the Orange bike too but around my area there is one dealer (damn) and after talking to some people who owned them (they all loved it) but they all said soem parts were harder to get. I also did not like the prices on the orange bikes. I still like the 400 and the 520. ?

Maybe one day.

Peace
 
Joined
May 4, 2001
Messages
44
Likes
0
#4
I went through the same choice, but with dual sports. It was the DRZ400S vs KTM LC4 640. I went with the KTM only because I got a great deal on a used one, that I couldn 't pass up. $4500 for a one year old machine with 170 miles.

I ended up not even test driving the DRZ400S, but I have to say that the KTM is a very special machine. It has that visceral feeling like a Harley Davidson on the low revs, and a smooth wind like a motorboat at the high revs. It's all quality, crazy fast, and gets a lot of compliments and looks.
 

DougRoost

Subscriber
Joined
May 3, 2001
Messages
720
Likes
0
#5
Not even close -- KTMs are awesome. Pricing and parts are the only real issue since it all comes from Austria. I complain about KLX parts from my local dealer, but at least it's always a reliable 5-7 working days. My buddies who have KTMs love them but many times they find out a certain part is back-ordered, which means at LEAST 2 weeks, maybe much more. Still, a KTM 400 EX/C may well be my next bike.
 

biglou

#6
Parts price and availability

Trust me on this-The yellow guys are currently the most expensive (of the big four) for OEM parts. Even my counter guy agrees that their pricing is outrageous. I am constantly amazed at what the list prices are for some of the replacement parts I've purchased.
Not that I've purchased every one of these, but here's a sampling:
  • Service manual, 2000 DRZ400E- $75
  • Air filter element- $55 (Foam only)
  • 1999 RM250 front brake line clamp- $33
  • 2001 DRZ400 "Z400" side number plate decals- $15.97 EACH!
I've been told that these are the highest going right now. Would I buy yellow again? It's debatable.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2000
Messages
249
Likes
0
#7
KTM parts should be readily available in Sweden.Never rode a 520,but rode the KTM 400 and was astonished by the power and handling. Although I felt the forks needed a little tweeking.:D
 

penguin

N. Texas SP
Joined
Feb 19, 2000
Messages
390
Likes
0
#8
I have talked to several KTM owners at the Texas cross-sountry races and they all love their bikes but hate the parts availability problems and prices. Rumor has it that KTM is that parts meant for spares are being used to build new bikes due to the tremendous demand.I have test ridden both the 520 and the 400 and they are awesome and the E button is a godsend, I prefer the 400, but the parts issue has made me hesitate on going orange.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2000
Messages
97
Likes
0
#10
Well, I own a DRZE so you can see where I'm coming from. But I wanted a 520EXC bed. I couldn't find or afford one. I paid $4600 for thr DRZ and if I could have found one, a 520 would have been $7Gs. I have since ridden one and it is an awesome bike, but much higher mainenance than the Zuk. Minimal oil and 4 filters mean a lot of work quite often. I also know one owner who had his starter gear drive disintegrate, I'm told they suggest kick starting when cold and most of the time!

The parts prices, to say nothing of availability, are outrageous! My friend was just quoted $67 for a thermostat!?!? My Zuk is heavy and down on top end power compared to the KTooM and Yams, but it has the button and a wider power spread than the Yam. It also steers better than the Yam and I can afford the parts. BigLou, why would you by a factory air filter when you can get a better one from the aftermarket for $20?
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2001
Messages
3
Likes
0
#11
Agrred. I just got a 2001 drz400BUTTON. For what I paid I could almost have 2 for the price of a KTM. Not going to play into the petty brand war thing. I see a 470 kit and some grafix and a few odds and ends making this bike real fun. Yellow red blue green.. who gives a crap..It's all local dealer quality issue. As for a 55 dollar filter, good advice from PeteN.

The only thing I will say about the KTM4strokes that is negative other than owning stock in a filter warehouse is.. And don't get rammy on me fellas. They sound like they have a million miles on them in a very short time. Maybe it's just an exhaust vibration problem, but thay sound really well unitight or junky. But we know that isn't the case. Just tinny and rattly...sorry especially if you paid 7k. Oh yea that front fender seems rather surf boardish. It is thrify though because the 3 thousand dollar hi-performance motor only requires a couple pints of oil. Other than that I guess the biggest problem is that you have to own them for life because you can't sell them, no one wants a used one because well, parts are so expensive it seems risky. Other than a few quirks, I'd own one in a heartbeat. I love the school bus Orange to and that 2 by 6 oak plank seat is somewhat comfy.;)
 

Tennessee Thumper

Sponsoring Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2000
Messages
446
Likes
0
#12
Nutjob,Don't turn this into a "my bikes better than yours" thread.:) T-dog asked for people with experience on BOTH bikes.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 1999
Messages
11
Likes
0
#13
These are really two completely different bikes with different uses intended.
The DRZE is a TRAIL bike. Right down to the conventional forks and grease nipples in the linkage.
The Katooms are competion motorcycles with no compromises.
Define your use and make your choice.
And accept the bad that comes with the good in whish ever choice you make.


01 DR-Z400E
:)
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2001
Messages
3
Likes
0
#14
Some guys can win an event on an 83xr100 with a flat and some guys could have a factory sponsorship and still block the trail. So Brand wars are futile anyway.

t-dog go ride one. If you like it get it. Talk to your local bike pack. Remember a crap dealer can make a great bike bad. I happen to have full quality representation of all colors.

My work is done here. Please have a nice day!;)
 

trewent

Subscriber
Joined
May 26, 2000
Messages
72
Likes
0
#15
400's which to buy?

T-Dog, last year I was able to ride the KTM 400 exc and the Suzuki 400 DRZ 400 back to back. There is no comparison, the KTM is the best bike for woods or track if you ride hard and fast. If you like to cruise trails the Suz is Ok as long as you don' t push it hard, the motor is actually hotter than the KTM but soon as you start riding hard the Suz is wallowing badly due to inadequate suspension stiffness and/or bike weight, the KTM at speed is still wanting you to go faster. I bought the KTM, a year later... this is the first year in about 4 that I have not gone through 2-3 bikes looking for perfection. Then only one I would even consider is the new CRF450, but the e-button is so easy when you stall on a hill with the kick start on the hillside. Many will say the KTM is over priced, but truly the only things you have to add are barkbusters and a skid plate.