Originally posted by O'MALLEY_808
I have a:
2002 CR125 Making 40hp at the crankshaft
&
2003 CR250 Making 57hp at the crankshaft
Originally posted by O'MALLEY_808
I have a:
2002 CR125 Making 40hp at the crankshaft
&
2003 CR250 Making 57hp at the crankshaft
Originally posted by mxer842
all of this conjecture is kind of moot dont you think guys? if we know one thing for sure it is this:
~the 2strokes will die, not buy the lack of sales, this forum proves that we still have some die-hards, but because they will be illegal!!!that cannot, will not, and shall not be avoided. period. you can piss and moan all you want die-hards, you can hang on to the past all you want , but two-strokes will be no longer sold, and it is a matter of years before parts supplies for them all but dry up. four-strokes are the future of this sport, whether or not that will help or hamper the sport is up for debate, but that is where we are going.
two-strokes have emissions and four-strokes have noise, we are just trading one evil for another, and one enemy for another.
Originally posted by osheen
C'mon Rich-Have you ever been to a track? Go stand next to a track (or anywhere near a track where 2 and 4 stroke bikes are being ridden) and listen. You will predominately hear 4 strokes over the top of 2 strokes. How can you be so blind to this FACT? What does it take for something to become a fact anyway? No, I didn't conduct a study for years and years. I didn't use a bunch of scientific fluff. I used my common sense and reasoning and observed this with no bias to anything except which is louder and more annoying. Is that not good enough? Anybody who has ears can point out loud bikes and I can assure you they will pick out more 4 strokes than 2 at any average riding place. If it's any consolation, I think all bikes are too loud. There is no reason why our bikes can't all be KDX200 quiet.
I guess for those of you who don't think noise shuts down riding areas, you won't mind Washougal MX park being shut down in the future if things don't change quickly. They have been under the gun for noise in the last few years. They must make it quieter or else their permit will be denied in the future. They have had several public hearings over the past few years. During the hearings, the neighbors of the track have voiced their opinions for reasons to shut it down such as erosion, traffic, poluting nearby streams, hurting property values and so on. But the number one reason they want it gone is NOISE. It is the issue that carries the most weight and they all agree on it. There are houses cropping up all over surrounding the track. When all the neighbors get together, they usually win. It doesn't matter if the race track was there 31 years before the houses.
Originally posted by denis#1
As for the 250 2 stroke, I think it is a better than a 450. Just look at the who the first three spots were at Anaheim supercross last week (all 3 were YZ250's)
Originally posted by DougRoost
Most amazing about that was Tim Ferry returning to a 2 stroke! He's been carrying the 4 stroke banner for Yamaha for years...guess they feel they don't need the 4 stroke banner carried anymore.
Originally posted by denis#1
I know this has been said before but, the reason the 250F is so fast as compared to a 125 is because it is a 250. It is twice the size. If is was a 125F vs. a 125 2 stroke, the 4 stroke would be slow that we would all still be saying that 4 strokes suck.
As for the 250 2 stroke, I think it is a better than a 450. Just look at the who the first three spots were at Anaheim supercross last week (all 3 were YZ250's)
Originally posted by denis#1
the reason the 250F is so fast as compared to a 125 is because it is a 250. It is twice the size.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?