flyingfuzzball
Member
- May 10, 2007
- 957
- 0
- Thread starter
- #26
how is that the solution...
Hey :think: don't drag me into this! :laugh:knowiam said::nener:
Law firm of: Dewey , Cheatem and Howe
Bingo! :cool:MagnaTrey said:Red streamers on a cable? Clearly indicates an attempt to make the cable more visible, no malice in my opinion.
Prop owner and child aside, why was a kid riding at dusk on private property? Gimme' a break, this tragic loss could have been prevented with a little common sense and supervision from the parent/s. :bang:
But this would require that mother accept responsibility for her son's actions. Or state that he is responsible. Isn't our whole society currently based on the fact that there is always somebody else that can be blamed for our mistakes? Any lawyers out there with an opinion?MagnaTrey said:Red streamers on a cable? Clearly indicates an attempt to make the cable more visible, no malice in my opinion.
Prop owner and child aside, why was a kid riding at dusk on private property? Gimme' a break, this tragic loss could have been prevented with a little common sense and supervision from the parent/s. :bang:
Solid State said:True, but the landowner still has plausible liability because the kid died on his land - and from an obstacle that he placed there. If there's was no clearly visible sign warning of the cable and it can be shown the cable was hard to see, the landowner is in deep doo-doo. Better check the insurance limits.